Your story about how you got together with Patrick gives me hope that I will one day get that close to my organic chemistry TA... *sigh*
muchmuch
· 10 months ago
Can I ask you a serious question...how does a reader win an orgasm?
I mean can I enter the competition or is this a way to keep non wanted people like myself from not entering your lame ass competition. This is the first time I post...just wondering though.
Katzenbach
· 10 months ago
Thanks for finally sharing the story about you and patrick
Tara
· 10 months ago
fyi: you also called me after calling jason anxious about your first date with patrick and i gave you nearly the exact opposite advice to him. not all your friends 'have the mindset of someone who wants to get into law school'. ;)
robogunathand
· 10 months ago
You know what I hate about your website? and YOU as a person. This is the second time I am posting. What I hate is the fact that all of you chinese people, and I hate to generalize are so damn prejudist. I don't mind the fact that you are a slut. I mean you are a slut, I am a saint compared to you. The problem is that you asian girls are such cockblockers and such haters sometimes. There is no love whatsoever to other people other than the all white crap. Oh man, I would not be so jaded if people would be nicer and polite but for the most part most asian people are portrayed as smart and they are really not, they only portrayed as such because they seem to have a lot in common with caucatians. And I am not hating on caucatian people but they are SOOO fucking racist and asian girls -as women- help to further accentuate this idea of racism. It is horrible, so I read your blog. I know I am generalizing but I know what I am saying has an element of truth into it, I have only read very little and I think your tone with regards to what you say is irresponsible. Not now but on previous posts but whatever it is just your blog. I wish things would be more equal in society but they are not from bottom to the top things are so unequal and then you get to higher places of academia where you would think people's attitudes are going to be much more richer in terms on how they treat people and they are not.....they are just well modified schools of oppression to help further cement the idea of those who have over those who do not have..help coerce people more into inferior status. I don't want to change all of that, but I just wish that you would see how much little asian whores like you have as an impact on men as a whole, especially white males and I stress the use of the word white as opposed to caucatian. There is so much exclusion in society already as it is and so much prejudism and hidden racism and then when shit happens to you in higher places of academia that is where it hurts the most. 'Cause to a certain degree you would think that your smarts, moral values and same level of ambition would make you similar but is not. And all of this is thrown into a further limbo of inequality and racisms and prejudism 'cause of women...women like you.
For someone who "hates to generalize", this is an awfully long generalization.
mynameandiamnotold
· 10 months ago
this coulde be made into a thesis.... i do agree that most of it is non-sensical.
however a link could be established to links of power and how this is predominant in certain classes among society.
I am not just arguing or picking an argument with you for the sake of arguing about girls.... I am talking about social injustice as I have been able to experience it. It does have a lot of sense...otherwise you would not have apolgized.
apology - to a certain extend accepted. In this day an age, you don't really know who to talk about when it comes to social unfairness....social councilors and even people that are THERE to help you have their own agendas and can lead you towards a path that might in the end not be beneficial towards the person. There are many variables to consider in a society and which class we are talking about....this generally applies to class struggle.
I am sure that relationships and how they have evolved and even their political connotations as well as their social dimensions can be explained and applied even into economic and political models .......... this is why I keep hanging out in this biatch! To a certain extend it does provide an interesting insight and it depends on how you digest the information and your prespective in the world.
still....nice blog...weird colour.
mynameandiamnotold
· 10 months ago
I guess what I am saying is that there is a lot of wood in the original and subsequent argument to refine.....and it could be made into something much more concrete sociology - politics and economics all go together hand in hand..........after........a....l.......l................................... coke head!
Maxie
· 10 months ago
Hi - I'm Maxie, and I'm a 34 year old accounts manager by day, event security guard by night (which means that my panties are constantly wet by the parade of hot rock stars, local celebrities and hockey players that I see on a regular basis). My relationship status is married (unhappily) with a lover (happy) on the side. I found you by typing in a bunch of gibberish and hitting the first link that popped up. KIDDING. I found out about the giveaway by surfing over from An Errant Wife's blog, whom I discovered through Cute as a Button. My preference would be the Naughtibod (I've been eyeballing one of those suckers for months, but the economy being what it is, disposable income is incredibly limited, especially when supporting a nasty infidelity habit).
a) My craziest first date experience? Which one to choose? Would have to be the night that I went to a club with my friends, and my date (Anthony - whom I stole from another "friend"). We ran into a few other people we knew, one of whom was "Rob". Well, he & I hit it off to the point where sparks were blinding any spectators. After a few shots of tequila, chased by several beers, I somehow convinced Anthony to drive BOTH Rob & I back to my parents house - they were out of town - and he did. He kissed me goodnight and just LEFT without so much as an arguement (we never did go out again). Well, I didn't know Rob very well, but he was hot and we were dying to fuck. So after a few hours of mind-numbingly mediocre sex (it seemed better at the time due to the tequila), he left to go to work. Hours later, the cops picked him up for using MY DAD'S credit card, which he'd scammed from the dresser. Last time I EVER brought em home.
b) Love is a many splendored thing...love...lifts us up where we belong. ALL YOU NEED IS LOVE.
Eugene
· 10 months ago
Your story about finding Patrick is very sweet Just goes to show that just because a person is sexually liberal does not mean they are a slut and have no heart and are incapable of being in love and a committed relationship (wow that was long...) Have a great valentines day
Dude
· 10 months ago
You're pathetic. You are such a Julia Allison wanna be, except way uglier, uninteresting, and stupid. Thanks for the vapid posts. Ech.
robogunathand
· 10 months ago
hahaahahahaha!
that is so mean but so true.
I was kind of captivated by the content of this blog, especially since I do go the same school that this girl goes to but for the most part the content is so vapid and shit.. But I feel bad for the girl though...'cause she has been treated like shit by previous bf and ultimately she is only searching for love and she is a girl. So after some serious studying, doing hard work or even reading really horrible news and how the world is soo fucked up.....it is kind of funny (like laugh out loud funny) to see lena chen keep posting her "anatomy of an outfit" , " cup cakes", "dildo reviews" etc etc.
It is so vapid, superficial and so full of nothing that it makes for amazing reading time. I bet you that a few harvard prof. read this site and masturbate to what she previously wrote or just read it and never say a thing. And plus all the faggots that run the crimson that secretly wish they could bang her.
In all justice, the blog has really died down and the readership will never be the same..unless she starts whoring back once again. But that would be mean becuase she risks going back to the shrink and boozing it up and sexing it up ..but that is what made the blog so worth it in the first place. Now is all full of vanity shit and narcisistic opinions and empty opinions that are backed up by more empty stuff.
fuck I am more poorer then probably her f cking dog yet I have more backbone and better moral values than this girl.
Keep going!! - it is hilarious to see you posting in the chicktionary....oh man...
oh and by the way that story from the paki ..is pure hatin' bullshit. yes I do refer to them as paki....they can refer to me as they want this is how we do around where I live.
FormerChristianChick
· 10 months ago
Lena, if we do enter the contest and if we win, will you announce the names or will you keep the names anonymous? I do have something I want to share about the 2nd question you posed, and it's serious (not funny) - but to the point. I just don't want others to associate it with my name.
Lena
· 10 months ago
I'll be posting the winning responses but not the names of the winners.
karlanoemi
· 10 months ago
the white girl said caucatian. lmaooooo.
Thursday's Child
· 10 months ago
1. Thursday's Child, 29, sexblogger, married to D 2. Thru Wilhemina Wang 3. Pure Wand - I've been drooling over it for months! 4b. I would tell them to keep on trying for two reasons. First, because they already know the alternative. They're living it. Second because love is worth it, no matter what. Every disappointment, every heartbreak just puts you one step closer to the real thing, and each letdown will make the real thing only that much better. My love for my D radiates out of every cell of my being - everything is worth it, just for that.
MHL
· 10 months ago
I read the winners' stories that you posted on TheChicktionary. The three stories about the "craziest first dates" were great. The story about the "boyfriend" in India was lame to the point of being completely pathetic.
Hello - he is not a "boyfriend," and theirs is not a "relationship." No matter what the culture, no guy is a "boyfriend" who refuses to acknowledge his girlfriend to his family, after she has spent thousands of dollars to travel around the world to see him. In fact, it doesn't sound as though he's made any effort in the "relationship" at all - lies to his family about her, doesn't travel to see her, only Skypes her (how lame)... What does she get out of pretending she's in a relationship? She is the one making all the effort and spending all the money on someone who clearly doesn't care about her all that much.
Her gratuitious line about pretending to be a mistress of an oil baron is also pathetic. As if anyone in the airline industry would be fooled by that.
That you can find this story "inspirational" is what makes you hopelessly naive. What's clear to everyone else is that this relationship isn't going anywhere.
The story about the lesbian is great though... she deserves BOTH first prizes.
Lena
· 10 months ago
I think it's hard for outsiders to understand what goes on in other people's relationships, and in my opinion, how much money you spend has nothing to do with your level of commitment to someone.
robogunathand
· 10 months ago
I wish that were true, but class differences along with race and social differences are always taken into consideration by male and (especially) by females. At least people who just don't want to have sex , sex and more sex but are looking for a relationship. You can't tell me that a nice $1000.00 present will not "buy" a certain amount of seriousness and committment into a relationship. It can't buy love but it will certainly buy attention and serious attention at that.
what planet are you living in Lena? I would love to have an economic argument with your vapid piece of shit head. Girls are the last ones to be frugal, it is usually the men who don't care about these type of things that usually "matter" to girls and those "small" details cost a shitload of money. So don't even bring economics into the psyche of a relationship argument - please.
robogunathand
· 10 months ago
I was just reading your comments with regards to your "causes". LOL I got hand it to you; while you do seem very much devoted to the issues that pertain to your interest I do have to say that they are vapid and do not hold any meaningful value other than the superficial sex, gay bullshit. That is the only thing that your boyfriend and you are envolved in? - that is it? Gay advocacy rights??? Be happy that they are making progress for some, with regards to the bill they are introducing. There are very few instances that a bill can introduce a wide scope with regards to its legislative mandate or power. Gay rights, especially here in the U.S have a long way to go and will not be widely recognized. If I were you I would approach the issue in a more different manner, activism through other perspectives that could include gay rights. The scope of your causes is so narrow and so shit. I mean, gay people tend to have a certain amount of clout and last I heard, there is not a hell of a lot of discrimination in the workplace towards gays. Being gay is actually kind of "cool" in some sort of weird sense these days. They tend to spend a lot in the economy since they can't have kids. Anyways, the scope of other cultural movements could be considered to be more wide and could by default include gay issues. What I am trying to say in short - get a new fucking cause to support, gay rights is so one dimensional! There are better causes to support.
robogunathand
· 10 months ago
the problem is that there are more important issues in this world that indeed take prevalance over gay rights. One of them, poverty. Two- inequality, three - racism. All of these things are indeed much more important in their scope than gay rights.
Look, all I am saying is that by supporting causes or ideas that have greater scope you include other causes by default.
You might think whatever you wish, however Gay rights in terms of scope and importance ranks of lesser importance than poverty, racism and prejudice that everyone every day encouters at work and many other social places. Thus, my point is addressing the dimension that gay rights has, compared to that of social rights applied in a wider scale viewed through poverty, racism and prejudism ....and even classism (as you have engaged yourself in) This means that such issues that are prevalent to you- could in fact be addressed through other channels of discourse, activism or legislative action. To be more bold: Not everyone is gay. But a lot of people are poor and get shit on every day and get picked on. My main points are the following: 1) You can address inequality of gay people by means of prejudism and even classism action against oppressive institutions or bodies. 2) It can also be included in other forms of activism. 3) By focusing only on gay rights and that itself being your main source of focus with regards to what you care about you show how fucking narrow your piece of shit head is. You only care about one and only one issue because you are a narcisist bitch. You only care about yourself and you do not care about what your writing or what you do to others leads to. You are irresponsible and you are very superficial in what you believe and what you do. You provide a lot of detail with regards to your life here and it is very apparent that you are not lead by an idea that has a wider scope but it is solely focused in some sort of micro-level narcisistic based ideal that starts with you and it ends with you and your bed, you and your boyfriend fucking, you writing about it, taking pictures, reviewing your stupid fucking new outfits and telling the world how much your care about gay people. Well, guess what? - you are a one dimensional whore, a bitch and a narcisistic fucking slut that only cares about your pussy and those individuals that care about narcisistic and hedoinistic values as well. Gay people are reknown to be hedoinistic and very self involved. Open up! and see that if you would stop having sex and basing politics, activism and activist ideals linked to sexual acts only. I guess what I am trying to say is that I am better than you and you just proved it to me, what I considered to be true, good and a greater principle that should guide society is not described by gay people, hedoinistic attitudes and superficial tendencies that you clearly clearly portray; however it is described by greater principles than that- values, morals, discipline and truth that guides voices, grassroots movements and motives more people than just a certain sect. If anyone should be dead it should be you, piece of shit classist fucking bitch. You tell people how much sex you have, how much you indulge in narcisistic activities and then you try to cover it all up by pretending to be true to a some sort of a greater cause? - An angry letter to some institution for advocacy of gay rights?? Who the fuck are you trying to fool??? - Do you think that by forgoing tomatoes that are extremely expensive it automatically gives you some sort of authority to post as true activist of any kind??? YOU ARE FUCKING JOKE!! You are the fucking but of a jokes at picket lines, at meetings where people really butt heads over true issues. You might be the girl that makes coffee and sucks dick for everyone to keep them calm. You are no fucking activist , you are no fucking advocate for ANY TRUE fucking cause other than your own fucking pussy, your wallet and your self rightous values.
I really do hope that some fucking anarchist, a proposition 8 supporter fucking lets you have it and makes you see how real life is. I don't enterely agree with proposition 8 (just as an example) however people like you should REALLY REALLY stick to issues such as reviewing dildos, "antomy of outfits" and where the fucking cheap greasy spoon is. That is what you are good at, not fucking proposing any sort of advocacy or change. Go fuck yourself you fucking piece of shit fake ass advocacy good for nothing dildo reviewer cock sucking whore. You give people dedicated to true causes a bad name.
robogunathand
· 10 months ago
Ps What is more funny is the level of hipocracy that is displayed in your stance. There is no real depth, no real truth, no real greater ideological cause other than you trying to play "let's be activistsof gay people"
whatever. I hated your guts from the begining for being so self centered and writing about so irresponsibly about something that should not really be quantified in words in the manner that you have possed here. Now I hate you more for pretending to be something that you are not really cut out for. Your set of values put together just don't have any depth, legitimacy or any poigniant relevance that should last more than a month and then the next fad comes along which will reveal itself as a new t-shirt, a new dildo toy and new blowjob stance.
Dedicate yourself to a cause that is cut out for you, may I suggest ummm: Pornstar or a hooker? that is much better.
Lena
· 10 months ago
Going the ad hominem route is not only unconvincing, but also intellectually cowardly, so I suggest that you stop if you want to be taken more seriously. It doesn't matter if I'm a "fucking piece of shit fake ass ... cock sucking whore" or not; you still haven't addressed my point that queers (though a minority) are just as deserving of defense as any marginalized group of people. You can't quantify different types of oppression and declare some more worthy of attention than others. And from your statements that "gay people are reknown to be hedoinistic and very self involved" and that "there is not a hell of a lot of discrimination in the workplace towards gays", you're revealing your own ignorance.
Since you really don't know me personally and clearly haven't read my blog thoroughly, you should probably refrain from making assumptions about my background or life. You have no idea where I come from, how I grew up, what my Harvard experience was like, or what my ideological beliefs are, yet are presumptuous enough to think you know me based off a blog.
Please keep in mind that I, like many people, write a personal blog. That means that the majority of my posts are uninteresting and irrelevant to those who don't know me. Personal blogs -- not just my own -- include inane facts like what someone ate, did, or wore today. If my consumption of cupcakes and fashion pisses you off, you should probably stop reading, because it's really not my job to censor myself to make your world a more pleasant place.
robogunathand
· 10 months ago
How is that intellectually uncowardly???
Homosexual people more often make things worste becuase they specifically advocate their own needs and causes in a manner in which only their issues become prevalent. If they really want to make progress with regards to their issues then what they should really do is make their issue more broad, approach their own issues with a wider scope. Nobody wants to admitt that they like gay people. Simple as that!- ask any common folk, ordinary hard working people. True struggle does not come from above, it comes from bellow, from the grunts, from people with hard wrists and hard arm strength and want it or not their logic and beliefs often get implement in a much more wider scope than a refined logic that is developed in upper echelons of society. Harvard, ivy league schools, government etc etc etc. The point that I am trying to make is not to cut out their voice or "interest" however I don't think their issues are more prevalent than poverty, lack of education, enequality or even racism that happens much more often in work scenarios, social scenarios and even in school through systematic oppression. I must re-state the fact that I don't hate homosexuals but I don't agree to their agenda becuase it is very one dimensional plain and simply becuase not everybody belongs to that category NOR do they want to belong. It just so happens that some people are born in such a state and cannot chose. However I do believe for this to be true and for this to be very simple and effective logic: Their struggle is not something that deserve much more attention than a poor individual or a person that has been oppresed for their colour of skin. They are a sector of the population that often has acess to wealth (which can be statiscally proven), much more political clout and a voice that is often the annoyance to many politicians becuase the true causes and needs that deserve attention is often found NOT in gay rights but in poor, disavantage and those oppresed through their colour of skin vis- a -vis or directly. Actually it is often the case that a lot of gay people do are put in a prevalent position in which they can themselves fomment the level of oppresion, even without knowledge. So don't tell that their cause is indeed more prevalent becuase it is not. Proposition 8 shows you a lot!- in a sate where people are allowed to have sex with each other for money and has such liberal values it tells you something, something that people really do think. PUSH THOSE VALUES DOWN! - FUCK THAT! THERE ARE BETTER AND MUCH MORE WORTHY CAUSES IN THIS WORLD THAN CONCENTRATION ON GAY RIGHTS. I don't hate gay people but I do not like them for making their cause so prevalent in this world, even when they often occupy prevalent positions in society.
Lena
· 10 months ago
If that's what you think about the LGBT movement, then I don't want to know what you think about feminism.
robogunathand
· 10 months ago
Believe it or not I like feminist literature. There are women that use feminism to oppress men overall and to further their beliefs overstepping that of men, however for the most part feminism itself is just a tool for women to advocate their rights in an academic scenario, where they have often proved themselves to be capable. I have no problems with feminist literature. The liason that is the problem is between the everyday women and most homosexuals. I would think that to a certain extend feminist are indeed capable of discerning to what extend their rights can be advocating without having to "cut throats" of man in an undeserving manner. Feminist theory is actually kind of interesting becuase it is often clever, precise, but mainly clever and indeed refreshing because of the fact that the point of view from which the subject usually communicates its ideas has indeed been predominantly considered throughout history as a subject that has indeed been oppressed. However, the same cannot be said for homosexuals; even with class warfare and class distinctions as stark as it might have been in previous times - they were still able to exist and occopy many position of power. You could make the case globally in that they have been indeed persecuted and often killed. However, there are many things to consider and I should name them just generally: 1) Class warfare in itself started out from lower classes and not from a homosexual point of view. 2) Women have been indeed persecuted and oppressed by many states (I am painting a global image here), however their role by nature has to be respected given the fact that they indeed occupy a predominant role in the process of breeding generations and so forth. Now this does not mean that homosexuals are lesser individuals but the point of view from the subject of women has considered itself as an oppressed individual is often a true voice, given the capacity and natural responsibility that can occupy in the process of passing on genes unto generations to come. The main point is not to say that homosexuals are lesser individuals but that women should have been considered as equals from the begining and perhaps this liason that exists between homosexuals (males) and women would not exist. The main problem is not homosexuals themselves but the prevalent nature that this liason between women and homosexuals attempts to create within society; which is an alliance that often directs itself to further perpetuate relationship that does not aim at empowering classes that need the help the most. 3) Unfortunately politics, government and creating models of society can be compared to the most principles levels of arithmetic; however they are can be applied in extended. These are substracting, adding, multiplying and dividing. Unfortunately for homosexuals their position in society is one that many politicians do not wish to fully advocate, and it is only taken up for strategically politicial purposes. The role of women in the other hand is much more diverse, flexible, fruitfull and it should be welcomed within society.
Homosexual males and even females have had more clout in political society throughout history. Of course they have been oppressed; but to be direct and answer your question: Societies are created for individuals to occupy, multiply and then divide themselves into groups and even some kill and die.
If this is the case and if this is completly true, then the role of women compared to that of lower classes themselves should be considered in similar view. Hard working folk that are often denied basic rights, racism, oppression in the workplace has provided a base for many models of society. This is because of the struggle that has come from bellow, not from levels of society where homosexuality has been tolerated and often hidden and even passed as an eccentricity. It is ok to be a homosexual these days but any comparisson to the working class struggle does not pass my view as something that is valid from many different points of views. 1) There are more prevalent causes to tackle in society indeed, which could benifit homosexuals by-proxy and not directly relating the policy itself only to a certain sect - as advocated by homosexual groups. 2) Basic principles: poverty, misery, prejudism and racist systematic policies themselves have been more effectively challenged by way of lower class struggles than from a homosexual point of view.
This is very general but in short: My yes is a YES on 8 !!!! but more interpreted in the sense of saying "not yet!" Not before the poor, oppressed, marginalized and the disenchanted by way of oppressive systematic policies are put in place. Your struggle is that of a social realm, our struggle and the people that I hope to represent is that of economic, systematic, prejudist and unequal access to that same system that marginalizes for no greater cause other than to oppress by way of skin and economic status predominantly.
Yes on 8 indeed! and not becuase I hate homosexuals but I don't believe their cause is much more prevalent then that of the struggle of poor classes and there are much much much more specific, interesting and important issues to tackle before gay rights.
robogunathand
· 10 months ago
I just want to say that I was really tired when I first posted here. As much as I wanted to make sense, I felt that I was in this little box and with some sort of a bad female that did not want me to write. I know I am a pain in the ass to you Lena, but I don't see eye to eye with your movement. I will save my little diatribe for a real class, a real worthy professor who can give me feedback and explain to me why my ignorance is the way it is. And why my esotheric wisdom as ignorant as it might seem to you is actual genious for its creativity and its dedication and its toughness and its originality. The ignorance that brings me here also makes me free to think within myself and find truth that I know is others and can therefore be applied to many others who are normal people. Homosexuals are not normal by any means, people that are poor, marginalized and oppresed are often just people that have been given the short end of the stick, a bad deal and a bad cause to fight from the begining. Missunderstood and often jaded as well. I count myself in and this is what my cause is, what I wrote above is pure shit. But I know how to polish it. And that is the best part.
Lena
· 10 months ago
Any "real class" or "worthy professor" will tell you that social movements are not mutually exclusive. When I called you "ignorant", I wasn't talking about your writing style; I was talking about your blatantly homophobic views.
lauren
· 9 months ago
hey, i read your blog and in a post awhile back it said you coached high school debate before? did you do CX/for what school? just curious...
All Comments
I mean can I enter the competition or is this a way to keep non wanted people like myself from not entering your lame ass competition.
This is the first time I post...just wondering though.
What I hate is the fact that all of you chinese people, and I hate to generalize are so damn prejudist. I don't mind the fact that you are a slut. I mean you are a slut, I am a saint compared to you. The problem is that you asian girls are such cockblockers and such haters sometimes. There is no love whatsoever to other people other than the all white crap.
Oh man, I would not be so jaded if people would be nicer and polite but for the most part most asian people are portrayed as smart and they are really not, they only portrayed as such because they seem to have a lot in common with caucatians. And I am not hating on caucatian people but they are SOOO fucking racist and asian girls -as women- help to further accentuate this idea of racism. It is horrible, so I read your blog. I know I am generalizing but I know what I am saying has an element of truth into it, I have only read very little and I think your tone with regards to what you say is irresponsible. Not now but on previous posts but whatever it is just your blog. I wish things would be more equal in society but they are not from bottom to the top things are so unequal and then you get to higher places of academia where you would think people's attitudes are going to be much more richer in terms on how they treat people and they are not.....they are just well modified schools of oppression to help further cement the idea of those who have over those who do not have..help coerce people more into inferior status. I don't want to change all of that, but I just wish that you would see how much little asian whores like you have as an impact on men as a whole, especially white males and I stress the use of the word white as opposed to caucatian.
There is so much exclusion in society already as it is and so much prejudism and hidden racism and then when shit happens to you in higher places of academia that is where it hurts the most. 'Cause to a certain degree you would think that your smarts, moral values and same level of ambition would make you similar but is not. And all of this is thrown into a further limbo of inequality and racisms and prejudism 'cause of women...women like you.
ugh!
Nice blog, weird weird weird fucking weird colour.
however a link could be established to links of power and how this is predominant in certain classes among society.
I am not just arguing or picking an argument with you for the sake of arguing about girls.... I am talking about social injustice as I have been able to experience it.
It does have a lot of sense...otherwise you would not have apolgized.
apology - to a certain extend accepted. In this day an age, you don't really know who to talk about when it comes to social unfairness....social councilors and even people that are THERE to help you have their own agendas and can lead you towards a path that might in the end not be beneficial towards the person. There are many variables to consider in a society and which class we are talking about....this generally applies to class struggle.
I am sure that relationships and how they have evolved and even their political connotations as well as their social dimensions can be explained and applied even into economic and political models .......... this is why I keep hanging out in this biatch! To a certain extend it does provide an interesting insight and it depends on how you digest the information and your prespective in the world.
still....nice blog...weird colour.
coke head!
a) My craziest first date experience? Which one to choose? Would have to be the night that I went to a club with my friends, and my date (Anthony - whom I stole from another "friend"). We ran into a few other people we knew, one of whom was "Rob". Well, he & I hit it off to the point where sparks were blinding any spectators. After a few shots of tequila, chased by several beers, I somehow convinced Anthony to drive BOTH Rob & I back to my parents house - they were out of town - and he did. He kissed me goodnight and just LEFT without so much as an arguement (we never did go out again). Well, I didn't know Rob very well, but he was hot and we were dying to fuck. So after a few hours of mind-numbingly mediocre sex (it seemed better at the time due to the tequila), he left to go to work. Hours later, the cops picked him up for using MY DAD'S credit card, which he'd scammed from the dresser. Last time I EVER brought em home.
b) Love is a many splendored thing...love...lifts us up where we belong. ALL YOU NEED IS LOVE.
Just goes to show that just because a person is sexually liberal does not mean they are a slut and have no heart and are incapable of being in love and a committed relationship (wow that was long...)
Have a great valentines day
that is so mean but so true.
I was kind of captivated by the content of this blog, especially since I do go the same school that this girl goes to but for the most part the content is so vapid and shit.. But I feel bad for the girl though...'cause she has been treated like shit by previous bf and ultimately she is only searching for love and she is a girl. So after some serious studying, doing hard work or even reading really horrible news and how the world is soo fucked up.....it is kind of funny (like laugh out loud funny) to see lena chen keep posting her "anatomy of an outfit" , " cup cakes", "dildo reviews" etc etc.
It is so vapid, superficial and so full of nothing that it makes for amazing reading time. I bet you that a few harvard prof. read this site and masturbate to what she previously wrote or just read it and never say a thing. And plus all the faggots that run the crimson that secretly wish they could bang her.
In all justice, the blog has really died down and the readership will never be the same..unless she starts whoring back once again. But that would be mean becuase she risks going back to the shrink and boozing it up and sexing it up ..but that is what made the blog so worth it in the first place. Now is all full of vanity shit and narcisistic opinions and empty opinions that are backed up by more empty stuff.
fuck I am more poorer then probably her f cking dog yet I have more backbone and better moral values than this girl.
Keep going!! - it is hilarious to see you posting in the chicktionary....oh man...
oh and by the way that story from the paki ..is pure hatin' bullshit. yes I do refer to them as paki....they can refer to me as they want this is how we do around where I live.
lmaooooo.
2. Thru Wilhemina Wang
3. Pure Wand - I've been drooling over it for months!
4b. I would tell them to keep on trying for two reasons. First, because they already know the alternative. They're living it. Second because love is worth it, no matter what. Every disappointment, every heartbreak just puts you one step closer to the real thing, and each letdown will make the real thing only that much better. My love for my D radiates out of every cell of my being - everything is worth it, just for that.
Hello - he is not a "boyfriend," and theirs is not a "relationship." No matter what the culture, no guy is a "boyfriend" who refuses to acknowledge his girlfriend to his family, after she has spent thousands of dollars to travel around the world to see him. In fact, it doesn't sound as though he's made any effort in the "relationship" at all - lies to his family about her, doesn't travel to see her, only Skypes her (how lame)... What does she get out of pretending she's in a relationship? She is the one making all the effort and spending all the money on someone who clearly doesn't care about her all that much.
Her gratuitious line about pretending to be a mistress of an oil baron is also pathetic. As if anyone in the airline industry would be fooled by that.
That you can find this story "inspirational" is what makes you hopelessly naive. What's clear to everyone else is that this relationship isn't going anywhere.
The story about the lesbian is great though... she deserves BOTH first prizes.
At least people who just don't want to have sex , sex and more sex but are looking for a relationship.
You can't tell me that a nice $1000.00 present will not "buy" a certain amount of seriousness and committment into a relationship. It can't buy love but it will certainly buy attention and serious attention at that.
what planet are you living in Lena?
I would love to have an economic argument with your vapid piece of shit head. Girls are the last ones to be frugal, it is usually the men who don't care about these type of things that usually "matter" to girls and those "small" details cost a shitload of money.
So don't even bring economics into the psyche of a relationship argument - please.
I got hand it to you; while you do seem very much devoted to the issues that pertain to your interest I do have to say that they are vapid and do not hold any meaningful value other than the superficial sex, gay bullshit. That is the only thing that your boyfriend and you are envolved in? - that is it? Gay advocacy rights???
Be happy that they are making progress for some, with regards to the bill they are introducing. There are very few instances that a bill can introduce a wide scope with regards to its legislative mandate or power. Gay rights, especially here in the U.S have a long way to go and will not be widely recognized. If I were you I would approach the issue in a more different manner, activism through other perspectives that could include gay rights. The scope of your causes is so narrow and so shit. I mean, gay people tend to have a certain amount of clout and last I heard, there is not a hell of a lot of discrimination in the workplace towards gays. Being gay is actually kind of "cool" in some sort of weird sense these days.
They tend to spend a lot in the economy since they can't have kids.
Anyways, the scope of other cultural movements could be considered to be more wide and could by default include gay issues. What I am trying to say in short - get a new fucking cause to support, gay rights is so one dimensional!
There are better causes to support.
All of these things are indeed much more important in their scope than gay rights.
Look, all I am saying is that by supporting causes or ideas that have greater scope you include other causes by default.
You might think whatever you wish, however Gay rights in terms of scope and importance ranks of lesser importance than poverty, racism and prejudice that everyone every day encouters at work and many other social places. Thus, my point is addressing the dimension that gay rights has, compared to that of social rights applied in a wider scale viewed through poverty, racism and prejudism ....and even classism (as you have engaged yourself in) This means that such issues that are prevalent to you- could in fact be addressed through other channels of discourse, activism or legislative action. To be more bold: Not everyone is gay. But a lot of people are poor and get shit on every day and get picked on. My main points are the following:
1) You can address inequality of gay people by means of prejudism and even classism action against oppressive institutions or bodies.
2) It can also be included in other forms of activism.
3) By focusing only on gay rights and that itself being your main source of focus with regards to what you care about you show how fucking narrow your piece of shit head is.
You only care about one and only one issue because you are a narcisist bitch. You only care about yourself and you do not care about what your writing or what you do to others leads to. You are irresponsible and you are very superficial in what you believe and what you do.
You provide a lot of detail with regards to your life here and it is very apparent that you are not lead by an idea that has a wider scope but it is solely focused in some sort of micro-level narcisistic based ideal that starts with you and it ends with you and your bed, you and your boyfriend fucking, you writing about it, taking pictures, reviewing your stupid fucking new outfits and telling the world how much your care about gay people. Well, guess what? - you are a one dimensional whore, a bitch and a narcisistic fucking slut that only cares about your pussy and those individuals that care about narcisistic and hedoinistic values as well. Gay people are reknown to be hedoinistic and very self involved. Open up! and see that if you would stop having sex and basing politics, activism and activist ideals linked to sexual acts only. I guess what I am trying to say is that I am better than you and you just proved it to me, what I considered to be true, good and a greater principle that should guide society is not described by gay people, hedoinistic attitudes and superficial tendencies that you clearly clearly portray; however it is described by greater principles than that- values, morals, discipline and truth that guides voices, grassroots movements and motives more people than just a certain sect.
If anyone should be dead it should be you, piece of shit classist fucking bitch. You tell people how much sex you have, how much you indulge in narcisistic activities and then you try to cover it all up by pretending to be true to a some sort of a greater cause? - An angry letter to some institution for advocacy of gay rights??
Who the fuck are you trying to fool??? - Do you think that by forgoing tomatoes that are extremely expensive it automatically gives you some sort of authority to post as true activist of any kind??? YOU ARE FUCKING JOKE!!
You are the fucking but of a jokes at picket lines, at meetings where people really butt heads over true issues. You might be the girl that makes coffee and sucks dick for everyone to keep them calm. You are no fucking activist , you are no fucking advocate for ANY TRUE fucking cause other than your own fucking pussy, your wallet and your self rightous values.
I really do hope that some fucking anarchist, a proposition 8 supporter fucking lets you have it and makes you see how real life is. I don't enterely agree with proposition 8 (just as an example) however people like you should REALLY REALLY stick to issues such as reviewing dildos, "antomy of outfits" and where the fucking cheap greasy spoon is. That is what you are good at, not fucking proposing any sort of advocacy or change. Go fuck yourself you fucking piece of shit fake ass advocacy good for nothing dildo reviewer cock sucking whore.
You give people dedicated to true causes a bad name.
What is more funny is the level of hipocracy that is displayed in your stance. There is no real depth, no real truth, no real greater ideological cause other than you trying to play "let's be activistsof gay people"
whatever. I hated your guts from the begining for being so self centered and writing about so irresponsibly about something that should not really be quantified in words in the manner that you have possed here. Now I hate you more for pretending to be something that you are not really cut out for. Your set of values put together just don't have any depth, legitimacy or any poigniant relevance that should last more than a month and then the next fad comes along which will reveal itself as a new t-shirt, a new dildo toy and new blowjob stance.
Dedicate yourself to a cause that is cut out for you, may I suggest ummm:
Pornstar
or a hooker?
that is much better.
Since you really don't know me personally and clearly haven't read my blog thoroughly, you should probably refrain from making assumptions about my background or life. You have no idea where I come from, how I grew up, what my Harvard experience was like, or what my ideological beliefs are, yet are presumptuous enough to think you know me based off a blog.
Please keep in mind that I, like many people, write a personal blog. That means that the majority of my posts are uninteresting and irrelevant to those who don't know me. Personal blogs -- not just my own -- include inane facts like what someone ate, did, or wore today. If my consumption of cupcakes and fashion pisses you off, you should probably stop reading, because it's really not my job to censor myself to make your world a more pleasant place.
Homosexual people more often make things worste becuase they specifically advocate their own needs and causes in a manner in which only their issues become prevalent. If they really want to make progress with regards to their issues then what they should really do is make their issue more broad, approach their own issues with a wider scope. Nobody wants to admitt that they like gay people. Simple as that!- ask any common folk, ordinary hard working people. True struggle does not come from above, it comes from bellow, from the grunts, from people with hard wrists and hard arm strength and want it or not their logic and beliefs often get implement in a much more wider scope than a refined logic that is developed in upper echelons of society. Harvard, ivy league schools, government etc etc etc. The point that I am trying to make is not to cut out their voice or "interest" however I don't think their issues are more prevalent than poverty, lack of education, enequality or even racism that happens much more often in work scenarios, social scenarios and even in school through systematic oppression. I must re-state the fact that I don't hate homosexuals but I don't agree to their agenda becuase it is very one dimensional plain and simply becuase not everybody belongs to that category NOR do they want to belong. It just so happens that some people are born in such a state and cannot chose. However I do believe for this to be true and for this to be very simple and effective logic:
Their struggle is not something that deserve much more attention than a poor individual or a person that has been oppresed for their colour of skin. They are a sector of the population that often has acess to wealth (which can be statiscally proven), much more political clout and a voice that is often the annoyance to many politicians becuase the true causes and needs that deserve attention is often found NOT in gay rights but in poor, disavantage and those oppresed through their colour of skin vis- a -vis or directly.
Actually it is often the case that a lot of gay people do are put in a prevalent position in which they can themselves fomment the level of oppresion, even without knowledge. So don't tell that their cause is indeed more prevalent becuase it is not. Proposition 8 shows you a lot!- in a sate where people are allowed to have sex with each other for money and has such liberal values it tells you something, something that people really do think. PUSH THOSE VALUES DOWN! - FUCK THAT! THERE ARE BETTER AND MUCH MORE WORTHY CAUSES IN THIS WORLD THAN CONCENTRATION ON GAY RIGHTS.
I don't hate gay people but I do not like them for making their cause so prevalent in this world, even when they often occupy prevalent positions in society.
I have no problems with feminist literature. The liason that is the problem is between the everyday women and most homosexuals. I would think that to a certain extend feminist are indeed capable of discerning to what extend their rights can be advocating without having to "cut throats" of man in an undeserving manner. Feminist theory is actually kind of interesting becuase it is often clever, precise, but mainly clever and indeed refreshing because of the fact that the point of view from which the subject usually communicates its ideas has indeed been predominantly considered throughout history as a subject that has indeed been oppressed. However, the same cannot be said for homosexuals; even with class warfare and class distinctions as stark as it might have been in previous times - they were still able to exist and occopy many position of power. You could make the case globally in that they have been indeed persecuted and often killed. However, there are many things to consider and I should name them just generally:
1) Class warfare in itself started out from lower classes and not from a homosexual point of view.
2) Women have been indeed persecuted and oppressed by many states (I am painting a global image here), however their role by nature has to be respected given the fact that they indeed occupy a predominant role in the process of breeding generations and so forth. Now this does not mean that homosexuals are lesser individuals but the point of view from the subject of women has considered itself as an oppressed individual is often a true voice, given the capacity and natural responsibility that can occupy in the process of passing on genes unto generations to come. The main point is not to say that homosexuals are lesser individuals but that women should have been considered as equals from the begining and perhaps this liason that exists between homosexuals (males) and women would not exist. The main problem is not homosexuals themselves but the prevalent nature that this liason between women and homosexuals attempts to create within society; which is an alliance that often directs itself to further perpetuate relationship that does not aim at empowering classes that need the help the most.
3) Unfortunately politics, government and creating models of society can be compared to the most principles levels of arithmetic; however they are can be applied in extended. These are substracting, adding, multiplying and dividing. Unfortunately for homosexuals their position in society is one that many politicians do not wish to fully advocate, and it is only taken up for strategically politicial purposes. The role of women in the other hand is much more diverse, flexible, fruitfull and it should be welcomed within society.
Homosexual males and even females have had more clout in political society throughout history. Of course they have been oppressed; but to be direct and answer your question: Societies are created for individuals to occupy, multiply and then divide themselves into groups and even some kill and die.
If this is the case and if this is completly true, then the role of women compared to that of lower classes themselves should be considered in similar view.
Hard working folk that are often denied basic rights, racism, oppression in the workplace has provided a base for many models of society. This is because of the struggle that has come from bellow, not from levels of society where homosexuality has been tolerated and often hidden and even passed as an eccentricity.
It is ok to be a homosexual these days but any comparisson to the working class struggle does not pass my view as something that is valid from many different points of views.
1) There are more prevalent causes to tackle in society indeed, which could benifit homosexuals by-proxy and not directly relating the policy itself only to a certain sect - as advocated by homosexual groups.
2) Basic principles: poverty, misery, prejudism and racist systematic policies themselves have been more effectively challenged by way of lower class struggles than from a homosexual point of view.
This is very general but in short: My yes is a YES on 8 !!!! but more interpreted in the sense of saying "not yet!"
Not before the poor, oppressed, marginalized and the disenchanted by way of oppressive systematic policies are put in place. Your struggle is that of a social realm, our struggle and the people that I hope to represent is that of economic, systematic, prejudist and unequal access to that same system that marginalizes for no greater cause other than to oppress by way of skin and economic status predominantly.
Yes on 8 indeed! and not becuase I hate homosexuals but I don't believe their cause is much more prevalent then that of the struggle of poor classes and there are much much much more specific, interesting and important issues to tackle before gay rights.
As much as I wanted to make sense, I felt that I was in this little box and with some sort of a bad female that did not want me to write. I know I am a pain in the ass to you Lena, but I don't see eye to eye with your movement. I will save my little diatribe for a real class, a real worthy professor who can give me feedback and explain to me why my ignorance is the way it is. And why my esotheric wisdom as ignorant as it might seem to you is actual genious for its creativity and its dedication and its toughness and its originality. The ignorance that brings me here also makes me free to think within myself and find truth that I know is others and can therefore be applied to many others who are normal people.
Homosexuals are not normal by any means, people that are poor, marginalized and oppresed are often just people that have been given the short end of the stick, a bad deal and a bad cause to fight from the begining. Missunderstood and often jaded as well.
I count myself in and this is what my cause is, what I wrote above is pure shit. But I know how to polish it.
And that is the best part.